Restore Congressional Accountability

A constitutional amendment to establish federal recall elections for members of Congress

Why This Is Needed Now

Record Low Approval

17%

Only 17% of Americans approve of Congressβ€”the lowest in decades.

Public Distrust

80%+

Over 80% of Americans believe politicians prioritize personal interests over public service.

Incumbent Protection

94-100%

In 2022, 94% of House incumbents and 100% of Senate incumbents seeking reelection won their races.

Existing accountability measures, such as impeachment and ethics investigations, are designed to address only cases of criminal misconduct, corruption, or clear violations of office rules. These mechanisms, while important, are limited in scope and often require a high threshold of evidence and political will to be enforced. As a result, they fail to provide a solution for situations in which elected officials have lost the confidence of the public but remain in office due to factors such as partisan gridlock, financial backing from powerful donors, or strategic political maneuvering by their party. This creates a significant gap in the democratic process, as there is no direct mechanism for voters to hold legislators accountable in real time outside of scheduled elections. Without a way to remove ineffective, unresponsive, or unpopular officials outside of extreme circumstances, public frustration can grow, leading to increased distrust in government institutions and a sense of disenfranchisement among voters. A more robust system of accountability would help ensure that those in power remain genuinely representative of the people they serve, rather than being shielded by political alliances and institutional barriers.

How It Works: Article V Convention

The Process

1

Two-thirds (34) of state legislatures must apply for an Article V Convention.

2

The convention is limited to proposing a congressional recall amendment.

3

Once proposed, three-fourths (38) of states must ratify the amendment.

4

The amendment becomes part of the Constitution.

Legal Safeguards

βœ“

Limited Scope

The resolution explicitly restricts the convention to a single subject: congressional recall elections.

βœ“

State Ratification Requirement

Any proposed amendment would still need ratification from three-fourths (38) of state legislatures.

βœ“

Legal Precedent

Supreme Court cases affirm that states retain control over the convention process.

Impact: Consequences of the Amendment

πŸ”· For the Public

βœ“

Direct Power Over Congress

Voters regain the ability to remove corrupt or negligent representatives.

βœ“

Higher Voter Engagement

More people will pay attention to how their representatives vote and act.

βœ“

More Trust in Democracy

The public sees that the system can actually hold politicians accountable.

βœ“

Increased Political Stability

Provides a legal, structured process to remove bad actors without waiting years for elections.

πŸ”· For Congress

βœ“

Fear of Removal Changes Governance

Members of Congress will be forced to listen to their voters, not just party leadership.

βœ“

Weakened Lobbyist Influence

Corporate lobbying influence weakens because voters, not donors, hold the final say.

βœ“

Reduced Partisan Gridlock

Congress can no longer block legislation just to sabotage the other party.

βœ“

Increased Government Efficiency

Congress will have a stronger incentive to move faster on key issues.

Get Involved

Join the movement to restore accountability in Congress. Together, we can make our representatives answer directly to the people.

Sign The Petition

Add your voice to thousands demanding constitutional accountability.

Contact Your Legislators

Tell your state representatives to support the recall amendment.

Find Your State Legislators

Enter your ZIP code to find your state legislators who can vote on a Congressional Recall Amendment.

Spread The Word

Share this movement on social media and with your community.